Showing posts with label Bank Audit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bank Audit. Show all posts

Friday, June 14, 2013

ICAI Press Release on Bank Audits

ICAI Press Release

June 12, 2013
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) would like to clarify that the present limit for Statutory Bank Branch Audit is still Rs.20 Crore (of advances) and not Rs.50 Crore as being erroneously reported in some sections of the media.
 
This is to inform that concerted and strategized efforts are being made to convince the Government to reduce the limit to Rs. 6 Crore, in Public Interest.
 
 

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Applicability of the Revised Audit Report Formats (including for bank/ bank branch audit reports) and Reporting in respect of Memorandum of Changes in Bank Audit Reports

ANNOUNCEMENT FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE MEMBERS

Applicability of the Revised Audit Report Formats (including for bank/ bank branch audit reports) and Reporting in respect of Memorandum of Changes in Bank Audit Reports

1. Members are requested to note that the audit reports for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 1st April 2012 are to be issued in the revised auditor’s report format, as prescribed in the Revised Standard on Auditing (SA) 700, Forming An Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements. The text of the revised auditor’s report appears in the Appendix to the said SA and can be downloaded from the website of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India at URL: http://220.227.161.86/17874sa700annx1.pdf.
2. FOR THE READY REFERENCE OF MEMBERS CARRYING OUT AUDIT OF BANKS/ BANK BRANCHES, THE AUDITING AND ASSURANCE STANDARDS BOARD OF THE ICAI HAS DEVELOPED RELEVANT AUDIT REPORT FORMATS IN LINE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE REVISED SA 700. THESE FORMATS HAVE BEEN GIVEN ALONGWITH THIS ANNOUNCEMENT (click here to download the formats). IT MAY ALSO BE NOTED THAT ICAI HAS ALREADY SENT A COMMUNICATION TO RBI REGARDING THESE REVISED AUDIT REPORT FORMATS BEING APPLICABLE FOR AUDITS FOR FY 2012-13 AND ONWARDS.
3. Further, members undertaking bank audits are also requested that, pursuant to a recent communication by the Reserve Bank of India to ICAI in this regard, the total number and amount of debits/ credits arising pursuant to the Memorandum of Changes submitted by them, be given under the heading “Other Matters Paragraph” on the face of the audit report/s issued by them. Necessary guidance in this regard is being provided in the 2013 Guidance Note on Audit of Banks which would be issued soon.

 

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Policy for Bank Audit Cooling Period for 33 centers - 2011

The number of eligible auditors / audit firms is more than the number of branches to be audited at the following 33 centres (viz. Mumbai, Kolhapur, Pune, Solapur, Thane, Kolkata, Chennai, Coimbatore, Delhi/ New Delhi, Ajmer, Bikaner, Jaipur, Kota, Udaipur, Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Surat, Hyderabad, Chandigarh, Raipur, Faridabad, Gurgaon, Panchkula, Panipat, Sonipat, Bangalore, Ernakulam, Indore, Nagpur, Ludhiana, Jodhpur, Bhilwara, and Ghaziabad).
 

In such centres, the auditors / audit firms will be put to a period of compulsory rest for two years after completion of five / four years of continuous branch audit. In other centres, where the number of eligible auditors / audit firms is less than the number of branches to be audited, the branch auditors on completion of five / four years of continuous branch audit will be subjected to the principle of rotation.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Know your Customer (KYC) guidelines - accounts of proprietary concerns

 

 
Date: Mar 26, 2010

Know your Customer (KYC) guidelines - accounts of proprietary concerns
RBI/2009-10/362
DBOD.AML.BC.No.80/14.01.001/2009-10

March 26, 2010
The Chairmen and Chief Executive Officers
All Scheduled Commercial Banks excluding RRBs/
All India Financial Institutions/Local Area Banks

Dear Sir,
Know your Customer (KYC) guidelines - accounts of proprietary concerns

A reference is invited to Para 2.4(a) of the Master Circular on KYC/AML/CFT/Obligation of banks under Prevention of Money laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 issued to banks vide DBOD.AML.BC.No.2/14.01.001/2009-10 dated July 1, 2009. It has been advised to banks that internal guidelines for customer identification procedure of legal entities may be framed by them based on their experience of dealing with such entities, normal bankers’ prudence and the legal requirements as per established practices. If the bank decides to accept such accounts in terms of the Customer Acceptance Policy, the bank should take reasonable measures to identify the beneficial owner(s) and verify his/her/their identity in a manner so that it is satisfied that it knows who the beneficial owner(s) is/are

2. For sake of clarity, in case of accounts of proprietorship concerns, it has been decided to lay down criteria for the customer identification procedure for account opening by proprietary concerns. Accordingly, apart from following the extant guidelines on customer identification procedure as applicable to the proprietor, banks / financial institutions should call for and verify the following documents before opening of accounts in the name of a proprietary concern:

i) Proof of the name, address and activity of the concern, like registration certificate (in the case of a registered concern), certificate/licence issued by the Municipal authorities under Shop & Establishment Act, sales and income tax returns, CST/VAT certificate, certificate/registration document issued by Sales Tax/Service Tax/Professional Tax authorities, Licence issued by the Registering authority like Certificate of Practice issued by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, Institute of Cost Accountants of India, Institute of Company Secretaries of India, Indian Medical Council, Food and Drug Control Authorities, etc.

ii) Any two of the above documents would suffice. These documents should be in the name of the proprietary concern.

4. These guidelines will apply to all new customers, while in case of accounts of existing customers, the above formalities should be completed in a time bound manner and should be completed before December 31, 2010.

5. Please acknowledge receipt.

Yours faithfully,
(Vinay Baijal)
Chief General Manager

Sunday, April 18, 2010

List of Branch Statutory Auditors recommended for appointment by RBI for the year 2009-10. - (31-03-2010)

Members are hereby advised (i) not to make telephonic/e-mail enquiries at the offices of Reserve Bank of India and (ii) in case any error creeps in during data transfer or otherwise, the records available with Reserve Bank of India would be final.

Further, as informed by RBI, “during the year 2009-10, the following 15 PSBs have exercised managerial autonomy in regard to selection and appointment of SBAs, viz. State Bank of India, Allahabad Bank, Bank of Baroda, Bank of India, Bank of Maharashtra, Canara Bank, Central Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Punjab National Bank, Syndicate Bank, UCO Bank , Union Bank of India, Punjab & Sind Bank and Andhra Bank.

The names of audit firms recommended by these 15 banks and approved by RBI and the names of auditors forwarded by RBI to the 11 PSBs which have not opted for managerial autonomy for the year 2009-10 are also displayed in the list.

The information in regard to branches allotted to these audit firms will be hosted by RBI on the web-site, after receipt of the information from the respective banks. RBI has advised Banks furnish the information regarding allocation of branches latest by April 30, 2010.

While forwarding names of audit firms, banks have been advised that not more than three branches may be allotted per audit firm and that they should allot branches, to the extent possible, to the audit firms taking into consideration their category and audit experience in such a way that bigger branches are audited by larger/experienced audit firms. It is not necessary that all the audit firms whose names are forwarded by RBI to various banks are allotted branch audit by the respective banks, as sufficiently higher number of audit firms are forwarded to banks in order to enable them to allot audit assignments as per their logistic requirements. It also often happens that some of the audit firms whose names are forwarded are either not allotted any audit assignment or are allotted assignment by some other bank, after their names are returned back to RBI due to various reasons and re-allotted/ considered for re-allotment, if any, required by some other bank. “

Monday, March 22, 2010